token.app › Compare › Qwen3.6 27B vs Claude Opus 5
Qwen3.6 27B vs Claude Opus 5
Qwen3.6 27B is 7.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Claude Opus 5 accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.6 27B | Claude Opus 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Anthropic |
| Input $/1M | $0.600 | $5.00 |
| Output $/1M | $3.60 | $25.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $1.35 | $10.00 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 262K | 128K |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.6 27B if…
- Costs less per token — $1.35 vs $10.00 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Claude Opus 5 if…
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.6 27B or Claude Opus 5?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.6 27B and Claude Opus 5, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.6 27B cheaper than Claude Opus 5?
Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper: $1.35 versus $10.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.600 vs $5.00. Output alone: $3.60 vs $25.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.6 27B and Claude Opus 5 have?
Qwen3.6 27B: 262,144 tokens. Claude Opus 5: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.6 27B and Claude Opus 5?
Qwen3.6 27B is made by Alibaba. Claude Opus 5 is made by Anthropic.