token.app › Compare › Qwen3.6 27B vs Inkling Small
Qwen3.6 27B vs Inkling Small
Inkling Small is 2.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling Small accepts the larger context window (524K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.6 27B | Inkling Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Thinkingmachines |
| Input $/1M | $0.600 | $0.450 |
| Output $/1M | $3.60 | $1.20 |
| Blended $/1M | $1.35 | $0.637 |
| Context window | 262K | 524K |
| Max output | 262K | 262K |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3.6 27B if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Inkling Small if…
- Costs less per token — $0.637 vs $1.35 blended
- Larger context window (524K)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.6 27B or Inkling Small?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.6 27B and Inkling Small, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.6 27B cheaper than Inkling Small?
Inkling Small is cheaper: $0.637 versus $1.35 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.600 vs $0.450. Output alone: $3.60 vs $1.20.
What context windows do Qwen3.6 27B and Inkling Small have?
Qwen3.6 27B: 262,144 tokens. Inkling Small: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.6 27B and Inkling Small?
Qwen3.6 27B is made by Alibaba. Inkling Small is made by Thinkingmachines.