token.app › Compare › Qwen3.6 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3.6 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3.6 27B is 2.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 Max accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.6 27B | Qwen3.8 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.600 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $3.60 | $6.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $1.35 | $3.00 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 262K | 131K |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.6 27B if…
- Costs less per token — $1.35 vs $3.00 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.8 Max if…
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.6 27B or Qwen3.8 Max?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3.8 Max, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.6 27B cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max?
Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper: $1.35 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.600 vs $2.00. Output alone: $3.60 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3.8 Max have?
Qwen3.6 27B: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3.8 Max?
Qwen3.6 27B is made by Alibaba. Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba.