token.app › Compare › Qwen3.6 27B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest
Qwen3.6 27B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest is 12× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.6 27B | DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | ~deepseek |
| Input $/1M | $0.600 | $0.090 |
| Output $/1M | $3.60 | $0.180 |
| Blended $/1M | $1.35 | $0.113 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 262K | 384K |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.6 27B if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest if…
- Costs less per token — $0.113 vs $1.35 blended
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.6 27B or DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.6 27B and DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.6 27B cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest?
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest is cheaper: $0.113 versus $1.35 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.600 vs $0.090. Output alone: $3.60 vs $0.180.
What context windows do Qwen3.6 27B and DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest have?
Qwen3.6 27B: 262,144 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.6 27B and DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest?
Qwen3.6 27B is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest is made by ~deepseek.