token.app › Compare › Qwen3.6 27B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Qwen3.6 27B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 12× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.6 27BDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ProviderAlibabaDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.600$0.090
Output $/1M$3.60$0.180
Blended $/1M$1.35$0.113
Context window262K1.0M
Max output262K384K
ReleasedApr 2026Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3.6 27B if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.113 vs $1.35 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.6 27B or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.6 27B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.6 27B cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper: $0.113 versus $1.35 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.600 vs $0.090. Output alone: $3.60 vs $0.180.
What context windows do Qwen3.6 27B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 have?
Qwen3.6 27B: 262,144 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.6 27B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
Qwen3.6 27B is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons