token.app › Compare › Qwen3.6 27B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.6 27B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 25× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.6 27B | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.600 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $3.60 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $1.35 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 262K | 66K |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.6 27B if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $1.35 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.6 27B or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.6 27B cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $1.35 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.600 vs $0.030. Output alone: $3.60 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Qwen3.6 27B: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.6 27B is made by Alibaba. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.