token.app › Compare › Qwen3.6 27B vs Grok 4.5
Qwen3.6 27B vs Grok 4.5
Qwen3.6 27B is 2.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Grok 4.5 accepts the larger context window (500K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.6 27B | Grok 4.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | xAI |
| Input $/1M | $0.600 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $3.60 | $6.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $1.35 | $3.00 |
| Context window | 262K | 500K |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.6 27B if…
- Costs less per token — $1.35 vs $3.00 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Grok 4.5 if…
- Larger context window (500K)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.6 27B or Grok 4.5?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.6 27B and Grok 4.5, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.6 27B cheaper than Grok 4.5?
Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper: $1.35 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.600 vs $2.00. Output alone: $3.60 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.6 27B and Grok 4.5 have?
Qwen3.6 27B: 262,144 tokens. Grok 4.5: 500,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.6 27B and Grok 4.5?
Qwen3.6 27B is made by Alibaba. Grok 4.5 is made by xAI.