token.app › Compare › Qwen3.6 27B vs Kimi K3
Qwen3.6 27B vs Kimi K3
Qwen3.6 27B is 4.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Kimi K3 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.6 27B | Kimi K3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Moonshot AI |
| Input $/1M | $0.600 | $3.00 |
| Output $/1M | $3.60 | $15.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $1.35 | $6.00 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3.6 27B if…
- Costs less per token — $1.35 vs $6.00 blended
Choose Kimi K3 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.6 27B or Kimi K3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.6 27B and Kimi K3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.6 27B cheaper than Kimi K3?
Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper: $1.35 versus $6.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.600 vs $3.00. Output alone: $3.60 vs $15.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.6 27B and Kimi K3 have?
Qwen3.6 27B: 262,144 tokens. Kimi K3: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.6 27B and Kimi K3?
Qwen3.6 27B is made by Alibaba. Kimi K3 is made by Moonshot AI.