token.app › Compare › Command R7B (12-2024) vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Command R7B (12-2024) vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Command R7B (12-2024) is 3.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Luna accepts the larger context window (1.1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Command R7B (12-2024)GPT-5.6 Luna
ProviderCohereOpenAI
Input $/1M$0.037$0.100
Output $/1M$0.150$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.066$0.225
Context window128K1.1M
Max output4K128K
ReleasedDec 2024Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Command R7B (12-2024) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.066 vs $0.225 blended
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…
  • Larger context window (1.1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Command R7B (12-2024) or GPT-5.6 Luna?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Command R7B (12-2024) and GPT-5.6 Luna, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Command R7B (12-2024) cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?
Command R7B (12-2024) is cheaper: $0.066 versus $0.225 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.037 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.150 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Command R7B (12-2024) and GPT-5.6 Luna have?
Command R7B (12-2024): 128,000 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
Who makes Command R7B (12-2024) and GPT-5.6 Luna?
Command R7B (12-2024) is made by Cohere. GPT-5.6 Luna is made by OpenAI.
Related comparisons
Command R7B (12-2024) full details GPT-5.6 Luna full details Command R7B (12-2024) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Command R7B (12-2024) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Command R7B (12-2024) vs Qwen3.8 Max Command R7B (12-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Command R7B (12-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Command R7B (12-2024) vs Inkling Small