token.app › Compare › Saba vs GPT-5.6 Terra
Saba vs GPT-5.6 Terra
Saba is 7.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Terra accepts the larger context window (1.1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Saba | GPT-5.6 Terra | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | OpenAI |
| Input $/1M | $0.200 | $1.00 |
| Output $/1M | $0.600 | $6.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.300 | $2.25 |
| Context window | 33K | 1.1M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Saba if…
- Costs less per token — $0.300 vs $2.25 blended
Choose GPT-5.6 Terra if…
- Larger context window (1.1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Saba or GPT-5.6 Terra?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Saba and GPT-5.6 Terra, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Saba cheaper than GPT-5.6 Terra?
Saba is cheaper: $0.300 versus $2.25 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $1.00. Output alone: $0.600 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Saba and GPT-5.6 Terra have?
Saba: 32,768 tokens. GPT-5.6 Terra: 1,050,000 tokens.
Who makes Saba and GPT-5.6 Terra?
Saba is made by Mistral AI. GPT-5.6 Terra is made by OpenAI.