token.app › Compare › Saba vs Kimi K3
Saba vs Kimi K3
Saba is 20× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Kimi K3 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Saba | Kimi K3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Moonshot AI |
| Input $/1M | $0.200 | $3.00 |
| Output $/1M | $0.600 | $15.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.300 | $6.00 |
| Context window | 33K | 1.0M |
| Max output | — | — |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Open weights |
Choose Saba if…
- Costs less per token — $0.300 vs $6.00 blended
Choose Kimi K3 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Saba or Kimi K3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Saba and Kimi K3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Saba cheaper than Kimi K3?
Saba is cheaper: $0.300 versus $6.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $3.00. Output alone: $0.600 vs $15.00.
What context windows do Saba and Kimi K3 have?
Saba: 32,768 tokens. Kimi K3: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Saba and Kimi K3?
Saba is made by Mistral AI. Kimi K3 is made by Moonshot AI.